Les Facteurs Déterminants De La Décision De Report D’achat : Une Revue De Littérature

Auteurs

  • Fatna MAACHOU , ,
  • Saïda Tahar Moulay , ,

Mots-clés :

attraction, compromis, conflit, durée de délibération d’achat, émotions, préférences, pression temporelle, règles de décision, report d’achat, traitement de l’information

Résumé

Cet article étudie les facteurs déterminants de la décision de report d’achat c’està- dire les différentes raisons individuelles et situationnelles qui conduisent les consommateurs à différer leurs achats. Nous proposons dans cet article, de contribuer à la compréhension de la décision du report d’achat en marketing et les facteurs expliquant cette décision. La méthodologie retenue s’appuie, exclusivement, sur une revue de littérature.

Références

 Anderson, C. J. (2003), The Psychology of Doing Nothing: Forms of Decision

Avoidance Result From Reason and Emotion, American Psychological

Association, Vol. 129, No. 1, 139–16).

 Arts, N. (2000), Report d’achat et biais cognitifs ; Etude de l’effet de cadrage

inter temporel, Thèse de doctorat en sciences de gestion, Université des

Sciences et Technologies de Lille.

 Beattie, J. & Barlas S. (2001), Predicting perceived differences in tradeoff

difficulty. dans Weber E, Baron J, Loomes G, editors. Conflict and tradeoffs

in decision making. Cambridge University Press; New York, NY: 2001. pp.

–64.

 Bettman, J. R., Johnson E. J., Luce M. F. & Payne J. W. (1993), Correlation,

conflict, and choice, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,

and Cognition 19 (4), 931-951.

 Broniarczyk & Griffin, (2014), Decision Difficulty in the Age of Consumer

mpowerment, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Volume 24, Issue 4 October,

Pages 608–625.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057740814000370.

 Chernev, A., Böckenholt, U. & Goodman, J. (2015), Choice overload: A

conceptual review and meta-analysis, Journal of Consumer Psychology 25, 2,

–358.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057740814000916.

 Cho, C., Kang, L. & Cheon, H.J. (2006), Online shopping hesitation, Cyber

Psychology and Behavior, 9, pp. 261-274. Cité dans Chandon J.-L et

Mamlouk L., (2012), Vers une meilleure compréhension du report de l’achat

en ligne, 11ème journée de recherche sur le e-marketing, Sep, Paris.

 Coeugnet, S. (2011), La pression temporelle dans les environnements

dynamiques : le cas de la conduite automobile, Université Lille Nord de

France.

 Darpy, D. (1999), La procrastination du consommateur : une contribution à

l’explication du report d’achat, Thèse de Doctorat en Sciences de Gestion,

Université Paris Dauphine-Paris IX.

 Darpy, D. (2000), Importance de la procrastination dans le processus de

décision d'achat, Approche sémiotique et mesure, Congrès de l'AFM, May

, Montréal, Canada. Cahier n°284 Mai, p.1-16.

 Darpy, D. (2002), Le report d’achat expliqué par le trait de procrastination et

le potentiel de procrastination, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, Vol.

, No. 2, p. 1-21.

 Dhar, R. (1992), To Choose Or Not to Choose: This Is the Question, in NA -

Advances in Consumer Research Volume 19, eds. John F. Sherry, Jr. and

Brian Sternthal, Provo, UT : Association for Consumer Research, pp. 735-738.

 Dhar, R. & Sherman, S.J. (1996a), The effect of common and unique features

in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research 23 (December), pp. 193–

 Dhar, R. (1996), The effect of decision strategy on deciding to defer choice,

Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9, pp. 265–281.

 Dhar, R. (1997a) Consumer preference for a no-choice option. Journal of

Consumer Research, 24, pp. 215-231.

 Dhar, R., & Nowlis, S. M. (1999), The effect of time pressure on consumer

choice deferral. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, pp. 369–384.

 Dhar, R., & Nowlis, S. M. (2004), To buy or not to buy: Response mode

effects on consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 41, pp. 423–432.

 Dhar, R., Nowlis, S. M., & Sherman, S. J. (2000), Trying Hard or Hardly

Trying: An Analysis of Context Effects in Choice, Journal of Consumer

Psychology, 9, 189-200

 Dhar, Ravi & Itamar Simonson (2003), The Effect of Forced Choice on

Choice, Journal of Marketing Research, 40 (May), pp. 146-60.

 Engel, J.F, Blackwell, R.D et Miniard, P.W (1990), Consumer Behavior, 6th

editions, The Dryden Press, Chicago II, 1990, 481p. Cité dans Bressoud, E.

(2001), De l’intention d’achat au comportement : essais de modélisations

incluant variables attitudinales, intra-personnelles et situationnelles, Thèse de

Doctorat en Sciences de Gestion, Université de Paris I - Panthéon Sorbonne.

 Ferrari, J. R. (1994), Dysfunctional Procrastination and its relationship with

self-esteem, interpersonal dependency, and self-defeating behaviors.

Personality and Individual Differences, 17(5), pp. 673-679.

 Ferrari, J.R., Johnson, J.L., McCown, W.C. (1995), Procrastination and Task

Avoidance: Theory, Research, and Treatment, New York Plenum Springer

Science & Business Media.

 Festinger, L. (1964), conflict, Design, and Dissonance. Oxford, England :

Stanford University Press.

 Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S. (1988), The relationship between coping and

emotion : Implications for theory and research, Social science & medicine 26

(3), pp. 309-317.

 Greenleaf, E., & Lehmann, D. (1995), Reasons for Substantial Delay in

Consumer Decision Making. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, pp. 186-199.

 Hamelin, J. (2002), La formation du prix de référence futur : déterminants et

effets temporels : une application au contexte de baisse des prix, Thèse de

doctorat en Sciences de Gestion, Université de tours.

 Howard, J. A. & Sheth J. N. (1969), The Theory of Buyer Behavior. NY :

New York : John Wiley. Cité dans Bressoud, E. (2001), De l’intention d’achat

au comportement : essais de modélisations incluant variables attitudinales,

intra-personnelles et situationnelles, Thèse de Doctorat en Sciences de

Gestion, Université de Paris I - Panthéon Sorbonne.

 Huber, J., Payne, J. W., & Puto, C. (1982), Adding Asymmetrically

Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity

Hypothesis, Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), pp. 90-98.

 Janis, I., & Mann, L. (1977), Decision Making : A psychological analysis of

conflict, choice and commitment. NY: Free Press.

 Lay, C. H. (1986), At last, my research article on procrastination, Journal of

Research in Personality, 20(4), pp. 474-495.

 Lazarus, R. S. (1991), Emotion and Adaptation, New York: Oxford University

Press.

 Lee, Y. K., Kimberlee, K. & Garcia,S. M. (2016), I'll Have Fries with That:

Increasing Choice Complexity Promotes Indulgent Food Choices, Psychology

& Marketing, 33, 7, 505.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mar.20893/abstract.

 Lehmann, D. R. & Parker, J. R. (2017), Disadoption, AMS Review, 7, 1-2,

https://link. springer.com/ article/ 10.1007%2Fs13162-017-0093-8.

 Lin, C.-H., Sun, Y. C., Chuang, S.-C. and Su, H.-J. (2008), Time Pressure and

the Compromise and Attraction Effects in Choice. Cité dans NA - Advances in

Consumer Research Volume 35, eds. Angela Y. Lee and Dilip Soman, Duluth,

MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: pp. 348-352.

 Luce, M. F. (1998), Choosing to avoid: Coping with negatively emotion-laden

consumer decisions, Journal of Consumer Research, 24, March, pp.409−433.

 Luce, M. F., Bettman, J. R., Payne, J. W., (2001), Emotionaldecisions :

Tradeoff difficulty and coping in consumer choice, Monographs of the Journal

of Consumer Research, pp. 1-209.

http://www.jstor.org.www.sndl1.arn.dz/stable/pdf/42636404.pdf

 Luce, R. D. (1977), The Choice Axiom After Twenty Years, Journal of

Mathematical Psychology, 15, pp. 215-233.

 Mamlouk, L. et Chandon J.-L. (2012), Vers une meilleure compréhension du

report de l'achat en ligne : le cas d'un billet de train. 11ème journée de

recherche sur le e-marketing, Sep, p. 1-41, Paris.

 Miller, J. G. (1944), Experimental studies of confict. In : J. M. V. Hunt’ ed,

Personality and the behavioral Disorders, Vol. 1. New York : Ronald Press.

Cité dans Decision Making under Uncertainty: Cognitive Decision Research,

Social Interaction, Development and Epistemology, Liberman et Förster,

 Newman, J. W. & Staelin, R. (1971), Multivariate Analysis of Differences in

Buyer Decision Time, Journal of Marketing Research, 8(2), pp. 192-198.

 Novemsky N., Dhar R., Schwarz N., & Simonson I. (2007), Preference

Fluency in Choice, Journal of Marketing Research Vol. XLIV, August, pp.

–356.

 Nowlis, S. M., & Simonson, I. (2000), Sales Promotions and Choice Context

as Competing Influences on Consumer Decision Making, Journal of Consumer

Psychology, 9, (1), pp. 1-17.

 Parker, J. R. & Lehmann,D. R.& Xie,Y. (2016), Decision Comfort, Journal of

Consumer Research, 43, 1, 113.

 Payne, J.W, Bettman, J. R. & Johnson E. J. (1992), Behavioral Decision

Research: A Constructive Processing Perspective, Annual Review of

Psychology, 43, pp. 87-131.

 Putsis, W. P., & Srinivasan, N. (1994), Buying or Just Browsing? The duration

of purchase deliberation. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(3), pp. 393-402.

 Redelmeier, Donald A., and Eldar Shafir. 1995. Medical Decision Making in

Situations That Offer Multiple Alternatives, Journal of the American Medical

Association, 273(4): pp. 302–05.

 Schwarz, N. (1990), Feelings as information: Informational and motivational

functions of affective states. In E.T. Higgins & R. Sorrentino (Eds.),

Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior, Vol.

, pp. 527-561, New York: Guilford Press.

 Shafir, E., Simonson, I. & Tversky, A. (1993), Reason-Based Choice,

Cognition, 29, Oct-Nov, pp. 11-36.

 Sharma, A., Moon, J., Bailey-Davis, L. & Conklin, M. (2017), Food

choices and service evaluation under time constraints: the school lunch

environment, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality

Management, 29, 12, 3191. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-06-2015-0269.

 Simonson, I. (1989), Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and

Compromise Effects, Journal of Consumer Research, 16, pp. 158-174.

 Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1992), Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and

Extremeness Aversion, Journal of Marketing Research, 29, pp. 281-295.

 Slovic, P. (1995), The construction of preference, American Psychologist. 50,

May, pp. 364-371.

 Soloman, L.J., & Rothblum, E.D. (1984), Academic procrastination:

Frequency and cognitive-behavioral correlates. Journal of Counseling

Psychology, Vol. 31, 4, pp. 503-509.

 Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice. In

M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp.

-376). New York: Academic Press.

 Tversky, A. & Simonson, I, (1993), Context-Dependent Preferences,

Management Science, 39 (October), pp. 1179–1189.

 Tversky, A., & Shafir, E. (1992), Choice under Conflict: The Dynamics of

Deferred Decision, Psychological Science, 3, pp. 358-361.

 Yi, S., & Baumgartner, H. (2004), Coping with negative emotions in purchase

related situations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 3, pp. 303−317.

 Zeelenberg, M., van Dijk, W. W., Manstead, A. S. R., & van der Plight, J.

(2000). On bad decisions and disconfirmed expectancies: The psychology of

regret and disappointment, Cognition & Emotion, 14, pp. 521–541.

Téléchargements

Publiée

2018-06-01

Comment citer

Les Facteurs Déterminants De La Décision De Report D’achat : Une Revue De Littérature. (2018). Revue d’Economie Et De Management, 17(1), 01-32. https://journals.univ-tlemcen.dz/REM/index.php/REM/article/view/413