Abstract
Introduction: The evaluation of teaching is part of a “Quality” approach. Objective: The aim of this work was to evaluate and adjust neurology teaching to the needs of fourth-year medical students. Methodology: this study providing the appreciation of fourth-year medical students of the theoretical and practical teaching of neurology during the academic year 2023-2024, through two anonymous appreciation questionnaires using a scale Likert and open-ended questions. The data collected was analyzed using Google Forms and Microsoft Excel software. Results: More than half of the students were satisfied with the punctuality of the teachers, judging that the educational objectives were respected. However, the hourly volume of the courses left insufficient time for personal revision according to 51.5% of the students and the association of a lecture with one or more clinical cases was approved by 97% of the students questioned. 70% of students appreciated the welcome on the first day by the teachers and the integration into the internship site. The clinical internship allowed 76.3% of students to attend clinical examinations on patients carried out by specialists. Discussion: This study revealed a coherence of the theoretical teaching of the neurology EU, however the transmissive lecture teaching; was widely contested by students, which requires moving towards an active and interactive lecture course. We have identified a real interest from students in clinical teaching, however, the asynchronization of theoretical and practical teaching has been identified as a disadvantage of this new organization. Conclusion: This work was an evaluation of teaching to achieve the objective of “Improve”. Establishing this type of formative evaluation for all teaching will certainly contribute to the success of the quality approach that the Faculty of Medicine of Tlemcen is implementing.
References
Mary C. Évaluation par les étudiants des activités d'enseignement par simulation à l'UFR d'Odontologie de Nantes 2024.
Cohen PA. Student Ratings of Instruction and Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis of Multisection Validity Studies. Review of Educational Research. 1981;51(3):281-309.
Paivandi S. Performance universitaire, apprentissage et temporalité des étudiants. Revue française de pédagogie. 2018
Masy J. « La temporalité, une disposition sociale et culturelle de construction de l’avenir ». Sociologies. 2013.
Duvivier R, Moulin M, Denis J. L’implication des étudiants dans la formation médicale. Pédagogie Médicale. 2011;11:181-6.
Vodovar D, Ricard JD, Zafrani L, Weiss E, Desrentes E, Roux D. Évaluation d’un enseignement multimodal intégrant du e-learning dans l’apprentissage de la réanimation et de la médecine d’urgence au cours du second cycle des études médicales. La Revue de Médecine Interne. 2020;41(6):368-74.
Howlett D, Vincent T, Watson G, Owens E, Webb R, Gainsborough N, et al. Blending online techniques with traditional face to face teaching methods to deliver final year undergraduate radiology learning content. European Journal of Radiology. 2011;78(3):334-41.
Wautier JL, Vileyn F, Lefrère JJ. Electronic learning : apprentissage interactif en médecine ou Socrate en habits électroniques. Transfusion Clinique et Biologique. 2005;12(2):150-2.
Vanpee D, Godin V, Pestiaux D, Gillet J. Stages dans un service d'urgence : réflexions sur leur apport spécifique dans la formation médicale de base. http://dxdoiorg/101051/pmed:2003024. 2003;4.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Medical Focus Journal