La prise en charge psychoPsychological care for children with deafness: family support

Authors

  • Meryem BOUKHELIF , Université ABOUBEKR BELKAID Tlemcen, ALGERIE ,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46325/jnddl.v2i1.77

Keywords:

Deafness, diagnosis, psychological follow-up, support

Abstract

Objective : This study aims to highlight the reality of hearing impairment in Algeria, the importance of early detection of hearing loss in infants and young children, and the role of psychological support and family guidance for children with cochlear implants.

Method : This study is based on a conceptual presentation and a review of the literature addressing hearing impairment, early hearing detection, psychological care, and family support, without conducting a field study.

Result: The study indicates that hearing impairment is a growing reality in Algeria, prompting the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Security to pay particular attention to the care of individuals with special needs. It also emphasizes that early detection of hearing loss promotes optimal growth and development, that primary prevention can prevent nearly half of all cases of deafness and hearing impairment, and that psychological support and family guidance are essential from diagnosis through initial intervention and follow-up.

Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of early detection, prevention, psychological support, and family guidance as essential components of the comprehensive care of children with cochlear implants

 

References

Bouchloukh, M. (2009). Rééducation fonctionnelle et prise en charge psychologique des enfants handicapés moteur (Thèse de doctorat en psychologie clinique). Université Mentouri Constantine.

Boutaleb, D. (2008). L’enfant sourd et sa famille. Insaniyat, 41, 95–107.

Bureau International d’Audiophonologie. (s.d.). Recommandation 24/1: Développement du langage chez l’enfant de 0 à 3 ans. http://www.biap.org/biapfrancais.htm

Gueytsy, E. D. (2008). L’aide précoce aux enfants atteints de déficiences auditives et visuelles à Novossibirsk. Empan, 71(3), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.3917/empa.071.0127

Lina-Granade, G., & Truy, E. (2005). Conduite à tenir devant une surdité de l’enfant. EMC – Oto-rhino-laryngologie, 2(3), 290–300.

Sander, M.-S., Lelièvre, F., & Tallec, A. (2007, août). Le handicap auditif en France: Apports de l'enquête Handicaps, incapacités, dépendance, 1998–1999. Études et Résultats, 589.

Matar Touma, V. (2006). L’implant cochléaire: L’apport du psychologue. Annales de philosophie et des sciences humaines, 22, 163–169.

Mondain, M., Blanchet, C., Venail, F., & Vieu, A. (2005). Classification et traitement des surdités de l’enfant. EMC – Oto-rhino-laryngologie, 2(3), 301–319.

Moussallem, P. (2006). La prise en charge éducative de l’enfant sourd implanté: Possibilités et limites. Annales de philosophie et des sciences humaines, 22, 179–184.

Portmann, M., & Portmann, C. (1993). Précis d’audiométrie clinique. Masson.

Virole, B. (2006). L’intégration des enfants handicapés: Les cas des enfants sourds et des enfants autistes. Annales de philosophie et des sciences humaines, 22, 199–203.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-05

How to Cite

La prise en charge psychoPsychological care for children with deafness: family support. (2023). Journal of NeuroDevelopmental Disorders and Learning, 3(1), 126-118. https://doi.org/10.46325/jnddl.v2i1.77

Similar Articles

1-10 of 42

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)